Time for UK construction to step up drone use?

In the first of a two-part report into drones and construction, Jim Meehan, an aerial imaging specialist at SkyHeld Cameras, asks if data quality or safety issues are hampering the adoption of drone technology.

Construction projects depend on timely, accurate information and BIM facilitates fast information exchange between partners, aiding workflow and reducing delays and errors. Collection of site data can be slow and costly, requiring groundwork and safety mitigation that can impede construction. 

Drones can quickly collect high-resolution images for input into PC or cloud-based photogrammetry systems to produce orthomosaic maps, 3D models and point clouds: precisely the digital data that a BIM system utilises. 

With a background in corporate IT, I have supported the implementation of many systems across a range of industries. Rapid adoption of new technology was a common theme in my job often driven by projected cost savings and workflow improvements.

So, given the generally acknowledged time and cost saving benefits of drones, should the construction industry accelerate their use? 

Drones can provide down to one centimetre per pixel density. Although not as geometrically accurate as ground survey equipment, the sheer density of data and the speed at which it can be collected provides an overall up-to-date picture not available with sparser less current data provided by ground surveys.

Drones images are from a high vantage point that ground based scanners cannot reach and are a valuable supplement to laser scanners and ground surveys. Ground control points can enhance drone data measurement and geometric accuracy.

Those companies that are already adopting drones are reaping the benefits and making smart decisions that were not possible before.

For example, Brasfield & Gorrie, one of the largest privately held construction firms in the US, determined site soil level requirements within a few days while the site was being levelled, ensuring that only the correct amount of excess soil was taken offsite.

Traditional methods would have taken weeks, while removal and recall would have incurred significant extra time and cost. There was also a marked improvement in estimation of concrete requirements.

Another major benefit that Brasfield & Gorrie has found is the ability to bring the site to others in the office. By capturing a quick assessment of a site with a drone and bringing that information to others who aren’t actually on the jobsite, it was like bringing the jobsite to the office and it greatly increased their ability to help project teams make timely decisions.

Drone imagery is also useful for meetings, client briefings, training, safety and status inspections.

What are the safety concerns?

Since 2001, an average of 50 people in Great Britain have died each year as a result of a fall from height and a further 8,702 are seriously injured (official HSE figures).

Drones enhance safety by providing the means to follow government guidelines to avoid work at height where other means are available (such as for visual inspection). Imagery allows safety managers to inspect the site for issues and reduce accidents while demonstrating compliance.

Despite media coverage, the safety record for civilian drones is surprisingly good. There have been millions of hobby and business civilian drone flights conducted globally over recent years with no reported fatalities in that time. There have been markedly few reported serious injuries. Such a safety record would be lauded in any other sphere. 

Brasfield & Gorrie has been operating a fleet of off-the-shelf drones on numerous projects for 18 months and now plans to implement drones across their portfolio. They recently received several awards for their safety record and safe practices.

The reliability of the current generation of lightweight drones that we use is much improved over previous generations. On-board system safety checks prevent take-off if any issues are detected. A safety ethos is instilled within CAA-approved pilots who undergo training and assessment before qualification. Most drones on a construction site are operated in a disciplined professional manner.

Surely the safety case alone should be an imperative for adoption at the earliest opportunity even without considering the cost savings and process benefits. Drones should be regarded as any other construction equipment, operated properly to provide positive productive benefits.

Image: Miro9966/

Story for BIM+? Get in touch via email: [email protected]


  1. Really great article. I feel your incredulity at the pace of adoption in the UK. The general pace of digital adoption in the construction market has surprised me in it’s sluggishness.

Comments are closed.

Latest articles in Analysis